Skip to main content

Establishing Farmers’ Understanding of Soil Health for the Future Development of ‘User-Friendly’ Soil Monitoring Packages

  • Chapter
Book cover Land Degradation

Part of the book series: The GeoJournal Library ((GEJL,volume 58))

Abstract

The main purpose of examining farmers’ understanding of soil health is to incorporate this understanding into monitoring packages on land condition. The findings of this project will allow farmers to develop a soil health checklist which is commensurate with their understanding of soil health — its definition, recognition and measurement. By developing a soil health checklist with farmers the research process acknowledged the importance of local conditions, including farmers’ existing knowledge about soils. The examination of farmers’ understanding of soil health was conducted in the north west cropping region of New South Wales, Australia. The project took a qualitative research approach and employed several techniques (interviews, soil testing and focus group discussions) to acquire and validate farmers’ understanding of soil health.

This paper reports on some preliminary results, focussing on farmers’ soil health checklists — the features they use, how they recognise those features, especially the language they use to describe a healthy and unhealthy soil, and finally the techniques they use to measure those features. The most spoken about features farmers used to identify soil health were plant growth and soil feel. Other properties which were consistently mentioned by farmers in relation to identifying soil health were organic matter, plant roots and soil life. Interestingly, farmers in workshops then dismissed some features, such as weeds, which had been mentioned frequently by farmers in interviews as being more related to identifying a soil type than the health of a soil. Ways of measuring or determining the health of a soil were informal and related closely to observation skills, but are usually carried out while conducting other farming operations. Nearly all farmers were unaware of any formal soil monitoring packages. To encourage and motivate farmers to monitor soil health will require the development of a package or soil health checklist which allows for adaptation to local conditions and soil types, provides a model or protocol for interpretation, and is disseminated to farmers by people from whom they regularly seek advice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bosch, O.J.H., Allen, W.I. and Gibson, R.S. (1996a) Monitoring as an integral part of management and policy making, Proceedings of Symposium Resource Management Issues, Visions, Practice, Lincoln University, New Zealand, 5–8th July, pp 12–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosch, O.J.H. Allen, W.J. William, W.J. and Ensor, A.H. (1996b) Monitoring and adaptive management paper, The Rangeland Journal 18, 23–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A. (1994) Community first: Landcare in Australia, in I. Scoones and J. Thompson (eds.), Beyond Farmer First–rural people’s knowledge, agricultural research and extension practice, Intermediate Technology Publications, London, pp 252–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carruthers, G. and Tinning, G. (1999) Environmental Management Systems in Agriculture,Proceedings of a National Workshop, May 26–28, 1999, RIRDC, Canberra, Publication No 99/94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamala, S. and Keith, K. (1995) Participative Approaches for Landcare - perspectives, policies and programs, Australian Academic Press, Brisbane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R. (1997) Whose Reality Counts? - putting the first last, Intermediate Technology Publications, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornwall, A., Guijt, I. and Welboum, A. (1994) Acknowledging process: challenges for agricultural research and extension methodology, in I. Scoones and J. Thompson (eds), Beyond Farmer First–rural people’s knowledge, agricultural research and extension practice, Intermediate Technology Publications, London, pp 98–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalai, R., Lawrence, P. Walker, J., Shaw, R.J., Lawrence, G., Yule, D., Doughton, J.A., Boume, A., Duivenvoorden, L., Choy, S., Moloney, D., Turner, L., King, C. and Dale, A. (1999) A framework to monitor sustainability in the grains industry, Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 39 605620.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniells, I. (1997) Soil Structure Assessment Workshop - getting the Message Right for Farmers, Proceedings of a workshop at Condobolin, NSW 2–3 rd December 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniells, I., Brown, R. and Hayman, P. (1996) Benchmark values for soil nitrogen and carbon in soils of the northern wheat-belt of NSW, NSW Agriculture, Orange.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, P. (1999) Special Report: Environmental Management Systems, Australian Farm Journal 9, 5–13. Freire, P. (1970) Pedagogy of the Oppressed, Continuum Publishing, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, N. and Gilkes, B. (1992) Farm Monitoring Handbook - A practical down-to-earth manual for farmers and land users, University of Western Australia Press, Perth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Industry Commission (IC) (1998) A Full Repairing Lease - Inquiry into Ecologically Sustainable Land Management, Report No. 60, Commonwealth Government, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, S. (1998) Native Vegetation on Farms Survey 1996 - a survey of farmers attitudes to native vegetation and landcare in the wheatbelt of Western Australia,National Development Program on Rehabilitation, Management and Conservation of Remnant Vegetation. Research Report 3/98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinman, S. (1991) Field-Workers Feelings, what we feel, who we are, how we analyze, in W. Shaffir and R. Stebbins (eds.), Experiencing Fieldwork: An Inside View of Qualitative Research, Sage Publications, Newbury Park, pp. 184–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kloppenburg, J. (1991) Social theory and de/reconstruction of agricultural science, local knowledge for an alternative agriculture, Rural Sociology 56, 519–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kloppenburg, J. (1992) Science in Agriculture: a reply to Molnar, Duffy, Cummins, and Van Santen and to Flora, Rural Sociology 57, 98–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koch, T. (1994) Establishing rigour in qualitative research: the decision trail, Journal of Advanced Nursing 19, 976–986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y.S. and Guba, E.G. (1985) Naturalistic Inquiry, Sage Publications, Newbury Park.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minichiello, V., Aroni, R., Timewell, E. and Alexander, L. (1990) In-Depth Interviewing. Researching People,Longman Cheshire, Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molnar, J.J., Duffy, P., Cummins, K.A. and Van Santen, E. (1991) Agricultural science and agriculture counterculture: paradigms in search of a future, Rural Sociology 57, 83–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, K., Nikandrow, A., Carter, J., Ramsey, M. and Mayfield, A. (1995) Field Guide to Faba Bean Disorders in Australia, NSW Agriculture, Tamworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdoch, J. and Clark, J. (1994) Sustainable knowledge, Geoforum 25, 115–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pannell, D. J. (2000) A framework for economic evaluation and selection of sustainability indicators in agriculture, Ecological Economics 33, 135–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RIRDC Short Report No.20 (1997) Developing Indicators for Sustainable Agriculture,retrieved March 4, 1998 from the World Wide Web, http://www.rirdc.gov.au/pub/shortreps/sr20.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Riling, N. (1988) Extension Science - information systems in agricultural development, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riling, N. (1994) Facilitating sustainable agriculture: turning policy models upside down, in 1. Scoones and J. Thompson (eds.), Beyond Farmer First–rural people’s knowledge, agricultural research and extension practice, Intermediate Technology Publications, London, pp 245–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seng, J.S. (1998) Praxis as a conceptual framework for participatory research in nursing, Advances in Nursing Science 20, 37–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sojka, R.E. and Upchurch, D.R. (1999) Reservations regarding the soil quality concept, Soil Science Society of America Journal 63, 1039–1054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spradley, J. (1979) The Ethnographic Interview, Holt, Reinhart and Wilson, Fort Worth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vereijken, P. (1992) A methodic way to more sustainable farming systems, Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 40, 225–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, P. (1999) The challenge of sustainability at the farm level: presidential address, Journal of Agricultural Economics 50, 371–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

De Bruyn, L.A.L. (2001). Establishing Farmers’ Understanding of Soil Health for the Future Development of ‘User-Friendly’ Soil Monitoring Packages. In: Conacher, A.J. (eds) Land Degradation. The GeoJournal Library, vol 58. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2033-5_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2033-5_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5636-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-2033-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics