Skip to main content

Asking Users. Questionnaires as Indirect Observation Tools in Human-Centred Design Approach. Application Cases

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 1062 Accesses

Part of the book series: Springer Series in Design and Innovation ((SSDI,volume 13))

Abstract

Human-Centred Design (HCD) investigation and assessment methods record the user’s needs and satisfaction level and are widely used to evaluate usability and orientate design decision making.Questionnaires are among the most useful and popular observation tools to study users’ opinions using quantifiable and comparable data. Their drafting needs requirements and evaluations in order to use them efficiently. Therefore, this paper intends to provide designers and researchers with useful tips for designing these tools. For this reason, it describes features of method and systematizes instructions from the literature. It also shows application cases to exemplify the relationship between method and type of data collected and to explore impacts of using different types of questionnaires in design processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.ergonomicsdesignlab.com.

  2. 2.

    SKILLROW Team: Francesca Tosi (Scientific Coordinator), Alessia Brischetto, Mattia Pistolesi, Ester Iacono, in collaboration with Technogym Research Center.

  3. 3.

    See Brischetto [2].

  4. 4.

    PUDCAD Team: Francesca Tosi (Scientific Coordinator), Antonella Serra, Alessia Brischetto, Ester Iacono.

  5. 5.

    XAll Team: Francesca Tosi (Scientific Coordinator), Antonella Serra, Alessia Brischetto, Giovanna Nichilò; project funded by Fondazione TIM [6].

References

  1. Bradburn NM, Sudman S, Wansink B (2004) Asking questions: the definitive guide to questionnaire design—for market research, political polls, and social and health questionnaires, Rev. Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brischetto A, Pistolesi M, Fedele G, Tosi F (2018) UX evaluation of a new rowing ergometer: the case study of the Technogym “SkillRow”. In: International conference on applied human factors and ergonomics. Springer, Cham, pp 233–243

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chin JP, Diehl VA, Norman KL (1988) Development of an instrument measuring user satisfaction of the human-computer interface. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, pp 213–218

    Google Scholar 

  4. Demers L, Weiss-Lambrou R, Ska B (2000) Quebec user evaluation of satisfaction with assistive technology QUEST (Version 2.0). Text available at https://www.midss.org/sites/default/files/questeng.scoring_sheetpdf_0.pdf

  5. Demers L, Weiss-Lambrou R, Ska B (2002) The quebec user evaluation of satisfaction with assistive technology (QUEST 2.0): an overview and recent progress. Technol Disab 14(3):101–105

    Google Scholar 

  6. FONDAZIONE TIM XAll project page. https://www.fondazionetim.it/progetti/patrimonio-storico-artistico/xall-tutta-unaltra-guida, last accessed 2020/06/22

  7. Guidicini P (1995) Questionari, interviste, storie di vita: come costruire gli strumenti, raccogliere le informazioni ed elaborare i dati. FrancoAngeli, Milano

    Google Scholar 

  8. ISO 9241-2019 Ergonomics of human-system interaction, Part 210: Human-centred design for interactive systems

    Google Scholar 

  9. Maguire M (2001) Methods to support human-centred design. Int J Hum Comput Stud 55(4):587–634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nielsen J (1994) Usability engineering. Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington

    Google Scholar 

  11. Preece JR, Rogers YY, Sharp H (2002) Interaction design: beyond human-computer interaction. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  12. PUDCAD GAME Homepage. https://www.pudcadgame.com/, last accessed 2020/06/22

  13. GARY PERLMAN QUIS page. https://garyperlman.com/quest/quest.cgi?form=QUIS, last accessed 2020/06/22

  14. Rauschenberger M, Schrepp M, Pérez Cota M, Olschner S, Thomaschewski J (2013) Efficient measurement of the user experience of interactive products. How to use the user experience questionnaire (UEQ). Example: Spanish language version. Int J Artif Intell Inter Multimedia 2(1):39–45

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schrepp M, Hinderks A, Thomaschewski J Applying the user experience questionnaire (UEQ) in different evaluation scenarios. In: Marcus A (eds) Design, user experience, and usability. Theories, methods, and tools for designing the user experience. DUXU 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8517. Springer, Cham, pp 383–392

    Google Scholar 

  16. Serra A (2020) Teaching universal design. Human-centred process and methodologies. In the PUDCAD Project. In: Tosi F, Serra A, Brischetto A, Iacono E (eds) Design for inclusion, gamification and learning experience. FrancoAngeli, Milano, pp 255–272

    Google Scholar 

  17. Technogym SPA (2020) Homepage. https://www.technogym.com/it/, last accessed 2020/06/22

  18. Tosi F, Brischetto A, Pistolesi M (2019/2020) Human-centred design—user experience: tools and intervention methods. In: Tosi F (ed) Design for Ergonomics. Springer Series in Design and Innovation, pp 111–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33562-5_6

  19. UEQ user experience questionnaire. https://www.ueq-online.org/, last accessed 2020/06/22

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesca Tosi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Tosi, F., Serra, A., Brischetto, A., Nichilò, G. (2021). Asking Users. Questionnaires as Indirect Observation Tools in Human-Centred Design Approach. Application Cases. In: Cordan, Ö., Dinçay, D.A., Yurdakul Toker, Ç., Öksüz, E.B., Semizoğlu, S. (eds) Game + Design Education. Springer Series in Design and Innovation , vol 13. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65060-5_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65060-5_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-65059-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-65060-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics