Skip to main content

Fitting Pareto II Distributions on Firm Size: Statistical Methodology and Economic Puzzles

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advances in Data Analysis

Part of the book series: Statistics for Industry and Technology ((SIT))

Abstract

We propose here a new implementation of the forward search, which is a powerful general method usually suitable for detecting extreme observations and for determining their effect on fitted models (Atkinson and Riani, 2000). Through the forward search we iteratively fit the Pareto II distribution to firm size data. In particular, a threshold is fixed to the fit of the Pareto II distribution through a progressive adaptation technique, performing at each iteration the χ 2 test to check for the acceptance of the null hypothesis. Yearly Zipf-plots of the truncated empirical distribution with superimposed theoretical Pareto II distribution highlight the adherence of the estimates to data for different size ranges. Possible economic interpretations of the results are then provided, referring in particular to the role of the stock market in shaping firm size distribution and to the firm size effect (Banz, 1981; Reingaum, 1981). More in general, we discuss possible implications of introducing our methodology in macroeconomic models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Arnold, B. (1983). Pareto Distributions. International Co-operative, Fairland, ME.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, A. C. and Riani, M. (2000). Robust Diagnostic Regression Analysis. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Axtell, R. (2001). Zipf distribution of U.S. firm sizes. Science, 293: 1818–1820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banz, R. (1981). The relationship between return and market value of common stock. Journal of Financial Economics, 9: 3–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benartzi, S. and Thaler, R.H. (1995). Myopic loss aversion and the equity premium puzzle. Quarterly Journal of Economics, CX: 73–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blinder, A (1986). A skeptical note on the new econometrics, in Prices, Competition and Equilibrium, Preston, M.H. and Quandt, R.E., Eds., P. Allan, London, pp. 73–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosato, L. and Ganugi, P. (2007). Statistical regularity of firm size distribution: The Pareto IV and truncated Yule for Italian SCI manufacturing. Statistical Methods and Applications, 16(1): 85–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Addario (2003). Monetary Theory and Policy. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forni, M. and Lippi, M. (1997). Aggregation and the microfoundation of Dynamic Macroeconomics. Oxford University Press USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibrat, R. (1931). Les Inégalités Economiques. Librairie du Recueil Survey, Paris.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, P.E. and Oulton, N. (1997). Zipf and the size distribution of firms. Applied Economics Letters, 4(4): 205–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, P.E. and Prais, S.J. (1956). The analysis of business concentration: A statistical approach. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 119: 150–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ijiri, Y. and Simon, H.A. (1977). Skew Distributions and the Sizes of Business Firms. North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. (1994). New challenges to the rationality assumption. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 150: 18–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, XLVII: 263–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleiber, C. and Kotz, S. (2003). Statistical Size Distributions in Economics and Actuarial Sciences. Wiley, New York.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Pareto, V. (1897). Cours d’Economie Politique. Lausanne, Swisse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quandt, R.E. (1966). On the size distribution of firms. American Economic Review, 3: 416–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reingaum, J. (1981). Misspecification of capital asset pricing: Empirical anomalies based on earning yields and market value. Journal of Financial Economics, 9: 19–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shafir, E., Diamond, P., and Tversky, A. (1997). Money illusion. Quarterly Journal of Economics, CXII: 341–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, M.H.R., Buldyrev, S.V., Havlin, S., Mantegna, R.N., Salinger, M.A., and Stanley, H.E. (1995). Zipf plots and the size distribution of firms. Economics Letters, 49: 453–457.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Steindl, J. (1965). Random Processes and the Growth of Firms. Griffin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, C. (2003). Monetary Theory and Policy. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Birkhäuser Boston

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Corbellini, A., Crosato, L., Ganugi, P., Mazzoli, M. (2010). Fitting Pareto II Distributions on Firm Size: Statistical Methodology and Economic Puzzles. In: Skiadas, C. (eds) Advances in Data Analysis. Statistics for Industry and Technology. Birkhäuser Boston. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-8176-4799-5_26

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics