Regular Article
The Effects of Habitat Fragmentation on Persistence of Source–Sink Metapopulations in Systems with Predators and Prey or Apparent Competitors

https://doi.org/10.1006/tpbi.1999.1422Get rights and content

Abstract

We consider systems with one predator and one prey, or a common predator and two prey species (apparent competitors) in source and sink habitats. In both models, the predator species is vulnerable to extinction, if productivity in the source is insufficient to rescue demographically deficient sink populations. Conversely, in the model with two prey species, if the source is too rich, one of the prey species may be driven extinct by apparent competition, since the predator can maintain a large population because of the alternative prey. Increasing the rate of predator movement from the source population has opposite effects on prey and predator persistence. High emigration rate exposes the predator population to danger of extinction, reducing the number of individuals that breed and produce offspring in the source habitat. This may promote coexistence of prey by relaxing predation pressure and apparent competition between the two prey species. The number of sinks and spatial arrangement of patches, or connectivity between patches, also influence persistence of the species. More sinks favor the prey and fewer sinks are advantageous to the predator. A linear pattern with the source at one end is profitable for the predator, and a centrifugal pattern in which the source is surrounded by sinks is advantageous to the prey. When the dispersal rate is low, effects of the spatial structure may exceed those of the number of sinks. In brief, productivity in patches and patterns of connectivity between patches differentially influence persistence of populations in different trophic levels.

References (76)

  • S. Harrison et al.

    Empirical evidence for metapopulation dynamics

  • R.D. Holt

    Predation, apparent competition and the structure of prey communities

    Theor. Popul. Biol.

    (1977)
  • R.D. Holt

    Population dynamics in two-patch environments; Some anomalous consequences of optimal habitat selection

    Theor. Popul. Biol.

    (1985)
  • R.D. Holt

    From metapopulation dynamics to community structure

  • M. Loreau et al.

    Source–sink dynamics and the coexistence of species on a single resource

    Theor. Popul. Biol.

    (1997)
  • H. Matsumoto et al.

    On predator invasion into a multi–patchy environment of two kinds of patches

    Ecol. Model.

    (1995)
  • H. Seno

    Effect of a singular patch on population persistence in a multi-patch system

    Ecol. Model.

    (1988)
  • P.A. Abrams et al.

    Apparent competition or apparent mutualism? Shared predation when populations cycle

    Ecology

    (1998)
  • L.J.S. Allen

    Persistence, extinction, and critical patch number for island populations

    J. Math. Biol.

    (1987)
  • M.B. Bonsall et al.

    Apparent competition structures ecological assemblages

    Nature

    (1997)
  • J.H. Brown et al.

    Turnover rates in insular biogeography: Effect of immigration on extinction

    Ecology

    (1977)
  • T.D. Burkey

    Extinction rates in archipelagoes: Implications for populations in fragmented habitats

    Conserv. Biol.

    (1995)
  • M.D. Cantwell et al.

    Landscape graphs: Ecological modeling with graph theory to detect configurations common to diverse landscapes

    Landscape Ecol.

    (1993)
  • H. Caswell

    Predator-mediated coexistence: A nonequilibrium model

    Am. Nat.

    (1978)
  • A.J. Davis et al.

    Making mistakes when predicting shifts in species range in response to global warming

    Nature

    (1998)
  • G.J. Davis et al.

    Juvenile dispersal, limited breeding sites, and the dynamics of metapopulations

    Theor. Popul. Biol.

    (1992)
  • T.M. Donovan et al.

    Reproductive success of migratory birds in habitat sources and sinks

    Conserv. Biol.

    (1995)
  • L. Fahrig et al.

    Habitat patch connectivity and population survival

    Ecology

    (1985)
  • L. Fahrig et al.

    Conservation of fragment populations

    Conserv. Biol.

    (1994)
  • P.L. Fiedler et al.

    Conservation Biology: The Theory and Practice of Nature Conservation and Preservation and Management

    (1992)
  • M.E. Gilpin

    Spatial structure and population vulnerability

  • M.E. Gilpin et al.

    Metapopulation Dynamics: Empirical and Theoretical Investigations

    (1991)
  • E.D. Grosholtz

    Interactions of intraspecific, interspecific, and apparent competition with host-pathogen population dynamics

    Ecology

    (1992)
  • I.A. Hanski et al.

    Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics, and Evolution

    (1991)
  • S. Harrison

    Metapopulations and conservation

  • A. Hastings

    Global stability in Lotka–Volterra systems with diffusion

    J. Math. Biol.

    (1978)
  • A. Hastings et al.

    Metapopulation dynamics and genetics

    Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst.

    (1994)
  • Cited by (36)

    • Biological control in a simple ecological model via subcritical Hopf and Bogdanov-Takens bifurcations

      2022, Chaos, Solitons and Fractals
      Citation Excerpt :

      In this paper we showed that, by changing from specialist to generalist parasitoid in the Rosenzweig-MacArthur model, a geometrical restriction characterizing the Hopf and Bogdanov-Takens bifurcations below the maximum of the host’s zero–isocline is induced. Ecologically, generalist parasitoids are of fundamental importance in the stability of the host-generalist parasitoid system, since they have a great ability to survive due to the non-predilection of a particular host specie (see [19]. This fact has been experimentally verified by [20].

    • Stability aware spatial cut of metapopulations ecological networks

      2021, Ecological Complexity
      Citation Excerpt :

      Thus, the study of dynamically stable spatial cuts, that is, the set of dispersal connections among the habitat patches, the removal of which partition the metapopulations network into two or more subnetworks with a minimal negative effect on the stability of the metapopulations dynamics, is important. Although stability of the metapopulations systems has been studied in the previous works (e.g., Jansen and Lloyd, 2000; Namba et al., 1999), but partitioning under stability constraints remains a research issue. We are interested here in those spatial cuts which preserve the Lyapunov linear stability (i.e., any slight disturbance will not grow as time evolves) in the obtained metapopulations sub-networks.

    • A theoretical study on effects of cultivation management on biological pest control: A spatially explicit model

      2016, Biological Control
      Citation Excerpt :

      Similar outcomes were already reported by previous metapopulation models. Namba et al. (1999) considered a prey-predator system comprised of two sedentary prey and one mobile shared predator, and demonstrated that one of the two prey regionally went extinct due to apparent competition mediated by the shared predator as the mobility of the predator increased. They also showed that the result also depended on spatial arrangements of patches the prey and predator inhabit.

    • Container-breeding mosquitoes and predator community dynamics along an urban-forest gradient: The effects of habitat type and isolation

      2014, Basic and Applied Ecology
      Citation Excerpt :

      This is clearly reflected in the high numbers of mosquito larvae and low numbers of predators in urban and agricultural habitats. Intermediate dispersal rates reduce the chance of local extinctions in the form of rescue effects; these cause relatively higher predator abundance and lower prey abundance (Holyoak & Lawler, 1996; Namba et al. 1999; Hauzy et al. 2010), which were exhibited in this study in those areas where the habitats were better connected. Thus, overall, our results show that the dynamics of these mosquitoes and their aquatic predators can be predicted by landscape conditions.

    • Adaptation of prey and predators between patches

      2009, Journal of Theoretical Biology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Population dispersal is one of the most important subjects in ecology. It is well recognized that the spatial distribution of populations and population dynamics are much affected by spatial heterogeneity and population mobility (Shigesada and Kawasaki, 1997; Namba et al., 1999; Diekmann et al., 2000; Murray, 2003; Arino and van den Driessche, 2006; Takeuchi et al., 2007; Lou, 2008). For fragmented landscapes, which are common because populations of most species occupy mosaic habitats and because of rapid destruction of natural habitats (Watkinson and Sutherland, 1995; Hanski, 1998), patch models are ideal tools to mimic population dynamics.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    f1

    E-mail: [email protected]

    1

    Present address: Department of Environmental Sciences, Osaka Women's University, Daison-cho 2-1, Sakai, Osaka 590-0035, Japan.

    View full text