ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
Real-Time Imaging
Volume 8, Issue 3, June 2002, Pages 203-212
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Purchase PDF (659 K)

Article Toolbox
 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1006/rtim.2001.0280    
How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)

Copyright © 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

Regular Article

Simulation Toolbox for 3D-FISH Spot-Counting Algorithms

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

A. M. Grigoryana, G. Hostetterb, O. Kallioniemib and E. R. Doughertyc

a Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA

b National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA

c Department of Electrical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA


Available online 5 August 2002.

Abstract

Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) is a molecular diagnostic technique in which a fluorescent labeled probe hybridizes to a target nucleotide sequence of DNA. Upon excitation, each chromosome containing the target sequence produces a fluorescent signal (spot). New technology provides a stack of images on multiple focal planes throughout a tissue sample. Multiple-focal-plane imaging helps to overcome the biases and imprecision inherent in single-focal-plane methods. New algorithms are being proposed to take advantage of the multiple focal planes. This paper presents a simulation toolbox that generates synthetic spots, both signal and noise, with which to evaluate algorithm performance. By using the toolbox, preset algorithm parameters can be tuned or optimized. Two critical issues for any algorithm are the sampling rate, which is the number of focal planes used, and the parameters for the filter that determines which detected spots are signal and which are noise. One would like to use a minimal number of focal planes for reasons of both time and cost, and one would like to have a noise filter that optimally balances the passing and non-passing of signal and noise spots. As demonstrated, it is possible to go further and calibrate the noise filter so that the expected number of counted spots, both signal and noise, is approximately equal to the actual number of signal spots.


Real-Time Imaging
Volume 8, Issue 3, June 2002, Pages 203-212
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.