Elsevier

NeuroImage

Volume 13, Issue 2, February 2001, Pages 328-338
NeuroImage

Regular Article
Functional Fields in Human Auditory Cortex Revealed by Time-Resolved fMRI without Interference of EPI Noise

https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2000.0683Get rights and content

Abstract

The gradient switching during fast echoplanar functional magnetic resonance imaging (EPI-fMRI) produces loud noises that may interact with the functional activation of the central auditory system induced by experimental acoustic stimuli. This interaction is unpredictable and is likely to confound the interpretation of functional maps of the auditory cortex. In the present study we used an experimental design which does not require the presentation of stimuli during EPI acquisitions and allows for mapping of the auditory cortex without the interference of scanner noise. The design relies on the physiological delays between the onset, or the end, of stimulation and the corresponding hemodynamic response. Owing to these delays and through a time-resolved acquisition protocol it is possible to analyze the decay of the stimulus-specific signal changes after the cessation of the stimulus itself and before the onset of the EPI-acoustic noise related activation (decay-sampling technique). This experimental design, which might permit a more detailed insight in the auditory cortex, has been applied to the study of the cortical responses to pulsed 1000 Hz sine tones. Distinct activation clusters were detected in the Heschl's gyri and the planum temporale, with an increased extension compared to a conventional block-design paradigm. Furthermore, the comparison of the hemodynamic response of the most anterior and the posterior clusters of activation highlighted differential response patterns to the sound stimulation and to the EPI-noise. These differences, attributable to reciprocal saturation effects unevenly distributed over the superior temporal cortex, provided evidence for functionally distinct auditory fields.

References (53)

  • P.A. Bandettini et al.

    Functional MRI of brain activation induced by scanner acoustic noise

    Magn. Reson. Med.

    (1998)
  • J.W. Belliveau et al.

    Functional mapping of the human visual cortex by magnetic resonance imaging

    Science

    (1991)
  • D. Bilecen et al.

    Tonotopic organization of the human auditory cortex as detected by BOLD-FMRI

    Hear. Res.

    (1998)
  • J.R. Binder et al.

    Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Human Auditory Cortex

    Ann. Neurol.

    (1994)
  • G.M. Boynton et al.

    Linear systems analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging in human V1

    J. Neurosci.

    (1996)
  • A. Bregman

    Auditory Scene Analysis

    (1990)
  • Z.H. Cho et al.

    Effects of the acoustic noise of the gradient systems on fMRI: A study on auditory, motor, and visual cortices

    Magn. Reson. Med.

    (1998)
  • W.B. Edmister et al.

    Improved auditory cortex imaging using clustered volume acquisitions

    Hum. Brain. Mapp.

    (1999)
  • G.F. Eden et al.

    Utilizing haemodynamic delay and dispersion to detect fMRI signal change without auditory interference: The behavior inter-leaved gradients technique

    Magn. Reson. Med.

    (1999)
  • E. Formisano et al.

    Localization and characterization of auditory perception through functional magnetic resonance imaging

    Technol. Health Care

    (1998)
  • E. Formisano et al.

    Tonotopic mapping in absence of scanner acoustic noise [Abstract]

    Neuroimage

    (1999)
  • K.J. Friston et al.

    Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach

    Hum. Brain Map.

    (1995)
  • A.M. Galaburda et al.

    Cytoarchitectonic organization of the human auditory cortex

    J. Comp. Neurol.

    (1980)
  • B. Gaschler-Markefski et al.

    Statistical methods in functional magnetic resonance imaging with respect to nonstationary time series: Auditory cortex activity

    Magn. Reson. Med.

    (1997)
  • R. Goebel et al.

    The constructive nature of vision: Direct evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging studies of apparent motion and motion imagery

    Eur. J. Neurosci.

    (1998)
  • D.A. Hall et al.

    “Sparse” temporal sampling in Auditory fMRI

    Hum. Brain Map.

    (1999)
  • Cited by (49)

    • Resting state network connectivity is attenuated by fMRI acoustic noise

      2022, NeuroImage
      Citation Excerpt :

      RSNs evaluated here were the default mode, dorsal attention, language, auditory and sensory-motor networks (left and right), all of which can be potentially modulated by scanner noise (Andoh et al., 2017). In particular, it seems to be self-explanatory that scanner acoustic noise was shown to have an influence on auditory structures (Scarff et al., 2004; Gaab et al., 2007; Di Salle et al. 2001; Rondinoni et al., 2013; Belin et al., 1999). Moreover, the default mode network has been suggested to be suppressed by MR scanner noise potentially signifying the transition into a more task-positive state (Gaab et al., 2007).

    • Perspective of functional magnetic resonance imaging in middle ear research

      2013, Hearing Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      One proposed method for reduction of active noise is an active noise cancellation technique reporting a noise reduction of up to 12 dB (Chambers et al., 2001). Another approach is to take advantage of the delayed hemodynamic onset of the BOLD signal and thereby separate scanner noise from experimental acoustic stimuli (Scheffler et al., 1998; Edmister et al., 1999; Hall et al., 1999; Di Salle et al., 2001). This technique has proven useful, but it is temporally inefficient since functional data acquisition is typically limited to a few scans per minute.

    • Developments in active noise control sound systems for magnetic resonance imaging

      2007, Applied Acoustics
      Citation Excerpt :

      Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanners can produce noise measuring over 130 dB SPL (see [1]). This noise stimulates the auditory nervous system, limiting the dynamic range for stimulus driven activity in functional MRI (fMRI) experiments and can influence other brain functions [2–13]. Even for structural scans it causes subject anxiety and discomfort in addition to the impediment to communications.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text