Elsevier

Journal of Human Evolution

Volume 33, Issue 6, December 1997, Pages 691-703
Journal of Human Evolution

Regular Article
A comparative study of stereolithographically modelled skulls of Petralona and Broken Hill: implications for future studies of middle Pleistocene hominid evolution

https://doi.org/10.1006/jhev.1997.0163Get rights and content

Abstract

Computer generated three-dimensional stereolithographic models of middle Pleistocene skulls from Petralona and Broken Hill are described and compared. The anterior cranial fossae of these models are also compared with that of another middle Pleistocene skull, Arago 21. Stereolithographic modelling reproduces not only the outer surfaces of skulls, but also features within the substance of the bones, and details of the internal braincase. The skulls of Petralona and, to a somewhat lesser degree, Broken Hill are extremely pneumatized. Previously undescribed features associated with pneumatization are detailed, along with their possible functional significance, polarity, and potential for understanding hominid cranial variation. Petralona and Broken Hill also exhibit a dramatic suite of cerebral features that is probably related to extensive pneumatization of the skull, namely frontal lobes that are tilted and located behind rather than over the orbits, laterally flared temporal lobes, marked occipital projection, and basal location of the cerebellum. Comparison of the anterior cranial fossae of Petralona, Broken Hill, and Arago 21 suggests that external resemblance of skulls may not always correlate with endocranial similarity. We believe that stereolithographic reconstructions have the potential for helping to resolve difficult questions about the origins of Neanderthal and anatomically modern people.

References (30)

  • W.W. Howells

    Neanderthals: names, hypotheses and scientific method

    Am. Anthropol.

    (1974)
  • R. Knapp et al.

    Stereolithography as a Challenge for Interdisciplinary Cooperation

    Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Rapid Prototyping in Medicine.

    (1994)
  • P. Le Floch-Prigent et al.

    The Petralona cranium: C.T.-scan findings

    Bull. Geol. Soc. Greece

    (1991)
  • D.E. Lieberman

    Testing hypotheses about recent human evolution from skulls: Integrating morphology, function, development, and phylogeny

    Curr. Anthropol.

    (1995)
  • W.P. Pycraft

    Description of the human remains

    Rhodesian Man and Associated Remains.

    (1928)
  • Cited by (89)

    • The biomechanical significance of the frontal sinus in Kabwe 1 (Homo heidelbergensis)

      2018, Journal of Human Evolution
      Citation Excerpt :

      In Neanderthals, the presence of large sinuses has been related to particular anatomical features, such as the lack of the canine fossa and the presence of large supraorbital tori (Coon, 1962; Wolpoff, 1999), but more recent research shows that Neanderthals do not have large sinuses relative to modern humans when cranial size differences are taken into account (Rae et al., 2011). Despite multiple studies, sinus function(s) are still poorly understood (Seidler et al., 1997; Laitman, 2008; Márquez, 2008). Some researchers consider that they are biological spandrels arising as a structural consequence of changes in other bones and/or structures, rather than because of a specific mechanism acting to create them or to serve any particular function (Enlow, 1968; O'Higgins et al., 2006; Zollikofer et al., 2008; Zollikofer and Weissmann, 2008).

    • The Pre-Mousterian industrial complex in Europe between 400 and 300 ka: Interpreting its origin and spatiotemporal variability

      2016, Quaternary International
      Citation Excerpt :

      The continuity of the main stone-working traditions, including small dimensions of stone artefacts, from the West Asian core–flake-tool assemblages dated to the late Early Pleistocene (and probably derived from the earlier and more simple core–flake assemblages), and the temporal precedence to the first appearance of Acheulean in particular regions suggest that the makers of Pre-Mousterian complex may represent descendant populations from the earliest hominins to enter Western Eurasia. Consequently, one can assume that the Pre-Mousterian hominins, apparently best represented now by the Petralona skull (Seidler et al., 1997; Rightmire, 2011; Balzeau, 2013), may be assigned to the later (and probably the last) representatives of the European “aboriginal” Homo, whose earlier representatives many authors define now as H. antecessor. This population of the earliest Europeans, which ancestral group is apparently related to the Dmanisi hominins, was likely separated in Europe for many hundred thousand years from the African branch of H. erectus, which likely descendants (Acheulean-making H. heidelbergensis) first penetrated into Europe at about 800–700 ka.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Hassler, R.Stephan, H.

    View full text