ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
advertisementadvertisement
Journal of Algorithms
Volume 29, Issue 1, October 1998, Pages 1-17
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Purchase PDF (240 K)

 
 
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1006/jagm.1998.0946    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Copyright © 1998 Academic Press. All rights reserved.

Regular Article

Thek-Steiner Ratio in the Rectilinear Plane*1

Al Borchersa, *, Ding-Zhu Dua, , Biao Gaob, and Pengjun Wanc, §

a Department of Computer Science, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455 b Lattice Semiconductor Corporation, 1820 McCarthy Blvd. Milpitas, California, 95125 c Department of Computer Science and Applied Mathematics, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois, 60616

Received 14 April 1995; 
revised 16 October 1997. 
Available online 8 April 2002.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Abstract

A Steiner minimum tree (SMT) in the rectilinear plane is the shortest length tree interconnecting a set of points, called the regular points, possibly using additional vertices. Ak-size Steiner minimum tree (kSMT) is one that can be split into components where all regular points are leaves and all components have at mostkleaves. Thek-Steiner ratio in the rectilinear plane, ρk, is the infimum of the ratios SMT/kSMT over all finite sets of regular points. Thek-Steiner ratio is used to determine the performance ratio of several recent polynomial-time approximations for Steiner minimum trees. Previously it was known that in the rectilinear plane, ρ2 = 2/3, ρ3 = 4/5, and (2k − 2)/(2k − 1) ≤ ρk(L1) ≤ (2k − 1)/(2k) fork ≥ 4. In 1991, P. Berman and V. Ramaiyer conjectured that in fact ρk = (2k − 1)/(2k) fork ≥ 4. In this paper we prove their conjecture.


Journal of Algorithms
Volume 29, Issue 1, October 1998, Pages 1-17
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.