ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
advertisementadvertisement
International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
Volume 52, Issue 1, January 2000, Pages 23-76
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Purchase PDF (413 K)

 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1006/ijhc.1999.0337    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Copyright © 2000 Academic Press. All rights reserved.

Regular Article

Evaluating focus theories for dialogue management

RENAUD LECŒUCHEa, , DAVE ROBERTSONb, CATHERINE BARRYc and CHRIS MELLISHd

Division of Informatics, 80 South Bridge, Edinburgh, EH1 1HN, Scotland, f1 Division of Informatics, 80 South Bridge, Edinburgh, EH1 1HN, Scotland, , f2 PSI-LIRINSA; I.N.S.A. Place Emile Blondel, 76130, Mont-Saint-Aignan, France, f3 Division of Informatics, 80 South Bridge, Edinburgh, EH1 1HN, Scotland, , f4

Received 26 October 1998; 
accepted 30 June 1999. ;
Available online 26 March 2002.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Abstract

Interactive reasoning tools are usually driven by an agenda of tasks to perform, rather than by conventions of human dialogue. On the other hand, theories of dialogue in natural language tend to ignore the constraints imposed by reasoning tools. This paper presents a system composed of a reasoning module and a dialogue manager which cooperate to produce dialogues that are suitable for reasoning and follow human dialogue conventions. The dialogue manager is driven by focus rules. Various competing focus theories exist but there have been few comparative studies of their use in non-trivial tasks. We make a comparative study of the use of focus theories, which requires us to be precise about our interpretation of our chosen focus theories, and to develop an innovative means of empirical testing for them. We evaluate the theories on an example of combined dialogue and reasoning from the domain of requirements elicitation.


 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.