Elsevier

Gynecologic Oncology

Volume 84, Issue 2, February 2002, Pages 321-326
Gynecologic Oncology

Regular Article
Evaluation of Patients after Extraperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection and Subsequent Radiotherapy for Cervical Cancer

https://doi.org/10.1006/gyno.2001.6528Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective. The presence of nodal metastases is the most important prognostic factor in cervical cancer. To adjust our therapy based on the true extent of the patient's disease, we performed an extraperitoneal lymph node dissection (EPLND) in all patients with cervical cancer prior to radiotherapy (RT) or radical hysterectomy.

Methods. Thirty-three patients with carcinoma of the cervix underwent EPLND. The value of this procedure as a diagnostic tool for monitoring the extension of the disease was determined. Additionally, EPLND/RT-associated treatment complications were monitored.

Results. The combined treatment approach of EPLND with RT or chemotherapy/RT was without major complications. Nineteen patients showed a temperature elevation, but only one patient had a fever of greater than 39.0°C. Fourteen (48.3%) of 29 patients experienced some degree of proctitis or diarrhea and 3 (10.3%) experienced cystitis during the course of RT. No grade 3 or 4 acute or late genitourinary or gastrointestinal toxicities were noted. EPLND changed the clinical management for 6 patients from a radical hysterectomy to RT and for 7 patients from standard-field RT to extended-field RT. Without EPLND these 7 patients would have received RT with standard pelvic fields that would not have treated involved lymph node areas at high risk for subsequent failure.

Conclusion. Thirteen (44.8%) of 29 patients received a different treatment than would otherwise have been administered with standard treatment planning. Therefore, we suggest that EPLND should be performed in all patients with cervical cancer prior to radical surgery or RT.

References (42)

  • ML Berman et al.

    Survival and patterns in cervical cancer metastatic to periaortic lymph nodes: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study

    Gynecol Oncol

    (1984)
  • RA Potish et al.

    The role of surgical debulking in cancer of the uterine cervix

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (1989)
  • M John et al.

    Final results of a phase II chemoradiation protocol for locally advanced cervical cancer: RTOG 85-15

    Gynecol Oncol

    (1996)
  • TE Schultheiss et al.

    Late GI and GU complications in the treatment of prostate cancer

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (1997)
  • HL Kottmeier

    Complications following radiation therapy in carcinoma of the cervix and their treatment

    Am J Obstet Gynecol

    (1964)
  • BA Goff et al.

    Impact of surgical staging in women with locally advanced cervical cancer

    Gynecol Oncol

    (1999)
  • R Potish et al.

    The morbidity and utility of periaortic radiotherapy in cervical carcinoma

    Gynecol Oncol

    (1983)
  • AA Plentl et al.

    Clinical significance of cervical lymphatics

    Lymphatic system of the female genitalia

    (1971)
  • AD Alvarez et al.

    Identification of prognostic factors and risk groups in patients found to have nodal metastasis at the time of radical hysterectomy for early-stage squamous carcinoma of the cervix

    Gynecol Oncol

    (1989)
  • DH Moore et al.

    What is the appropriate management of early stage cervical cancer (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Stages I and IIA), surgical assessment of lymph nodes, and role of therapeutic resection of lymph nodes involved with cancer?

    Monogr Natl Cancer Inst

    (1996)
  • Cited by (40)

    • Does para-aortic irradiation reduce the risk of distant metastasis in advanced cervical cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

      2017, Gynecologic Oncology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Also, is the morbidity that is related to the surgery reasonable, and is the delay of RT acceptable? Finally, is adjusting the primary treatment after surgical staging, based on the pathological results, associated with better survival? [27–32]. One phase III trial failed to demonstrate any impact on outcome, but it had a small sample size and was terminated prematurely due to significant morbidity that was related to an open surgical approach [33].

    • Nodal-staging surgery for locally advanced cervical cancer in the era of PET

      2012, The Lancet Oncology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Furthermore, patients must be given clear information about perioperative and late adverse effects, balanced with expected advantages of a treatment adapted to their prognostic characteristics. Complication rates of laparotomy range from 10% to 19% (table 3),36–43 and the extraperitoneal approach is superior in terms of reduced morbidity.38 However, the laparoscopic approach shortens hospital stay and is associated with a lower complication rate (0–7%) than laparotomy (table 4).4,34,44–50

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    To whom correspondence and reprint requests should be addressed at Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1, Freiburg University Medical Center, Hugstetter Strasse 55, D-79106 Freiburg/Brsg., Germany. Fax: 49-761-2703118. E-mail: [email protected].

    View full text