Regular ArticleEvaluation of Patients after Extraperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection and Subsequent Radiotherapy for Cervical Cancer
References (42)
- et al.
A prospective surgical pathological study of stage I squamous carcinoma of the cervix: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study
Gynecol Oncol
(1989) - et al.
Prognostic value of cervical size and pelvic lymph node status assessed by computed tomography for patients with uterine cervical cancer treated by radical radiation therapy
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
(1995) - et al.
Survival following extended field irradiation in carcinoma of cervix metastatic to para-aortic lymph nodes
Gynecol Oncol
(2000) - et al.
Expanded pelvic radiotherapy fields for treatment of local-regionally advanced carcinoma of the cervix: outcome and complications
Am J Obstet Gynecol
(1996) - et al.
Extended field radiation and cisplatin for stage IIB and IIIB cervical carcinoma
Gynecol Oncol
(1997) - et al.
Incidence, significance, and follow-up of para-aortic lymph node metastases in late invasive carcinoma of the cervix
Am J Obstet Gynecol
(1977) - et al.
Clinical-pathologic study of stage IIB, III, and IVA carcinoma of the cervix: extended diagnostic evaluation for paraaortic node metastasis—a Gynecologic Oncology Group study
Gynecol Oncol
(1990) - et al.
Cervical carcinoma: computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative staging
Obstet Gynecol
(1995) - et al.
Extraperitoneal pelvic lymphadenectomy to complement vaginal operations for cervical and endometrial cancer
Int J Gynaecol Obstet
(2000) - et al.
Extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal selective paraaortic lymphadenectomy in the pretreatment surgical staging of advanced cervical carcinoma (a Gynecologic Oncology Group study)
Gynecol Oncol
(1989)
Survival and patterns in cervical cancer metastatic to periaortic lymph nodes: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study
Gynecol Oncol
The role of surgical debulking in cancer of the uterine cervix
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
Final results of a phase II chemoradiation protocol for locally advanced cervical cancer: RTOG 85-15
Gynecol Oncol
Late GI and GU complications in the treatment of prostate cancer
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
Complications following radiation therapy in carcinoma of the cervix and their treatment
Am J Obstet Gynecol
Impact of surgical staging in women with locally advanced cervical cancer
Gynecol Oncol
The morbidity and utility of periaortic radiotherapy in cervical carcinoma
Gynecol Oncol
Clinical significance of cervical lymphatics
Lymphatic system of the female genitalia
Identification of prognostic factors and risk groups in patients found to have nodal metastasis at the time of radical hysterectomy for early-stage squamous carcinoma of the cervix
Gynecol Oncol
What is the appropriate management of early stage cervical cancer (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Stages I and IIA), surgical assessment of lymph nodes, and role of therapeutic resection of lymph nodes involved with cancer?
Monogr Natl Cancer Inst
Cited by (40)
Does para-aortic irradiation reduce the risk of distant metastasis in advanced cervical cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
2017, Gynecologic OncologyCitation Excerpt :Also, is the morbidity that is related to the surgery reasonable, and is the delay of RT acceptable? Finally, is adjusting the primary treatment after surgical staging, based on the pathological results, associated with better survival? [27–32]. One phase III trial failed to demonstrate any impact on outcome, but it had a small sample size and was terminated prematurely due to significant morbidity that was related to an open surgical approach [33].
Perioperative morbidity and rate of upstaging after laparoscopic staging for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer: Results of a prospective randomized trial
2015, American Journal of Obstetrics and GynecologyNodal-staging surgery for locally advanced cervical cancer in the era of PET
2012, The Lancet OncologyCitation Excerpt :Furthermore, patients must be given clear information about perioperative and late adverse effects, balanced with expected advantages of a treatment adapted to their prognostic characteristics. Complication rates of laparotomy range from 10% to 19% (table 3),36–43 and the extraperitoneal approach is superior in terms of reduced morbidity.38 However, the laparoscopic approach shortens hospital stay and is associated with a lower complication rate (0–7%) than laparotomy (table 4).4,34,44–50
- 1
To whom correspondence and reprint requests should be addressed at Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1, Freiburg University Medical Center, Hugstetter Strasse 55, D-79106 Freiburg/Brsg., Germany. Fax: 49-761-2703118. E-mail: [email protected].