ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
advertisementadvertisement
Computer Vision and Image Understanding
Volume 75, Issues 1-2, July 1999, Pages 133-149
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Purchase PDF (5356 K)

 
 
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1006/cviu.1999.0769    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Copyright © 1999 Academic Press. All rights reserved.

Regular Article

Features and Classification Methods to Locate Deciduous Trees in Images

Niels Haering and Niels da Vitoria Lobo

School of Computer Science, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida, 32816, f1

Received 14 April 1999; 
accepted 15 April 1999. ;
Available online 2 April 2002.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Abstract

We compare features and classification methods to locate deciduous trees in images. From this comparison we conclude that a back-propagation neural network achieves better classification results than the other classifiers we tested. Our analysis of the relevance of 51 features from seven feature extraction methods based on the graylevel co-occurrence matrix, Gabor filters, fractal dimension, steerable filters, the Fourier transform, entropy, and color shows that each feature contributes important information. We show how we obtain a 13-feature subset that significantly reduces the feature extraction time while retaining most of the complete feature set's power and robustness. The best subsets of features were found to be combinations of features of each of the extraction methods. Methods for classification and feature relevance determination that are based on the covariance or correlation matrix of the features (such as eigenanalyses or linear or quadratic classifiers) generally cannot be used, since even small sets of features are usually highly linearly redundant, rendering their covariance or correlation matrices too singular to be invertible. We argue that representing deciduous trees and many other objects by rich image descriptions can significantly aid their classification. We make no assumptions about the shape, location, viewpoint, viewing distance, lighting conditions, and camera parameters, and we only expect scanning methods and compression schemes to retain a “reasonable” image quality.


 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.