ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
advertisementadvertisement
Computer Vision and Image Understanding
Volume 64, Issue 1, July 1996, Pages 111-127
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Purchase PDF (634 K)

 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1006/cviu.1996.0048    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Copyright © 1996 Academic Press, Inc. All rights reserved.

Regular Article

Taking Advantage of Image-Based and Geometry-Based Constraints to Recover 3-D Surfaces

P. Fua and Y. G. Leclerc

SRI International, 333 Ravenswood Avenue, Menlo Park, California, 94025

Received 13 May 1994; 
accepted 7 June 1995. ;
Available online 22 April 2002.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Abstract

A unified framework for 3-D shape reconstruction allows us to combine image-based and geometry-based information sources. The image information is akin to stereo and shape-from-shading, while the geometric information may be provided in the form of 3-D points, 3-D features, or 2-D silhouettes. A formal integration framework is critical in recovering complicated surfaces because the information from a single source is often insufficient to provide a unique answer. Our approach to shape recovery is to deform a generic object-centered 3-D representation of the surface so as to minimize an objective function. This objective function is a weighted sum of the contributions of the various information sources. We describe these various terms individually, our weighting scheme, and our optimization method. Finally, we present results on a number of difficult images of real scenes for which a single source of information would have proved insufficient.


 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.