Regular Article
Structural Modifications of RNA Influence the 5′ Exoribonucleolytic Hydrolysis by XRN1 and HKE1 ofSaccharomyces cerevisiae

https://doi.org/10.1006/bbrc.1997.6877Get rights and content

Abstract

Two 5′ exoribonucleases, XRN1 and HKE1, ofSaccharomyces cerevisiaehave been found to have very important cellular roles, XRN1 playing a key role in mRNA turnover and HKE1 in pre-rRNA processing. Here, an analysis of strong secondary structures in RNA that cause blocks or stalls (accumulation of RNA fragments that are shortened from the 5′ end to the site of the secondary structure insertion) in the processive exoribonucleolytic hydrolysis reactions is reported. With both enzymes, oligo(G) tracts of lengths 18, 16, and 9 stall quite effectively, and the stalls are close to the start of the oligo(G) stretch. Two strong stem-loop structures cause measurable but low-level stalls with both enzymes. If the stem-loop structure is placed close to the 5′ end of the RNA, substantial inhibition of overall RNA hydrolysis occurs with HKE1 and less, but measurable, inhibition with XRN1. RNA structural modification caused by protein complexing has been investigated by using poly(A) binding protein. The hydrolysis of poly(A) by XRN1 is inhibited by poly(A) binding protein, while HKE1 activity is not affected.

References (32)

  • A. Stevens

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1980)
  • A. Stevens et al.

    Arch. Biochem. Biophys.

    (1987)
  • A. Stevens et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1995)
  • F.W. Larimer et al.

    Gene (Amst.)

    (1990)
  • F.W. Larimer et al.

    Gene (Amst.)

    (1992)
  • S. Kearsey et al.

    Trends Cell Biol.

    (1991)
  • Z. Liu et al.

    Cell

    (1994)
  • A.W. Johnson et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1991)
  • M.R. Vega Laso et al.

    J. Biol Chem.

    (1993)
  • D. Sen et al.

    Methods Enzymol.

    (1992)
  • N. Caruccio et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1994)
  • D.C. Amberg et al.

    Genes and Dev.

    (1992)
  • T.L. Aldrich et al.

    Mol. Cell. Biol.

    (1993)
  • D. Tishkoff et al.

    Mol. Cell. Biol.

    (1991)
  • C.C. Dykstra et al.

    Mol. Cell. Biol.

    (1991)
  • Cited by (39)

    • Subgenomic flaviviral RNAs: What do we know after the first decade of research

      2018, Antiviral Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      XRN-1 is a highly processive enzyme that has an RNA-helicase activity and is generally capable of digesting structured RNAs. When the ability of SLII, SLIV and DBI of WNV 3′UTR to stall XRN-1 was discovered, only the homopolymer G stretches of 9 + nucleotides were known to efficiently halt RNA digestion by XRN-1, whereas stem loops were thought to have very little effect on processivity of 5’ -> 3′ exoribonucleases (Poole and Stevens, 1997). It was therefore puzzling why stem loops within the faviviral genomes have such a dramatic effect on XRN-1 processing and at the same time do not interfere with viral polymerase moving in 3′ to 5′ direction on the viral template (+) RNA strand while synthesising (−) RNA strand.

    • Cellular 5′-3′ mRNA exonuclease Xrn1 controls double-stranded RNA accumulation and anti-viral responses

      2015, Cell Host and Microbe
      Citation Excerpt :

      The impressive increase in dsRNA accumulation in Xrn1-depleted, VacV-infected cells was unforeseen, as Xrn1 is a processive exonuclease whose substrate is single-stranded mRNA with exposed 5′-phosphate termini. Previous studies, however, have shown that it is capable of processing RNA stem loops (Decker and Parker, 1993; Poole and Stevens, 1997) and RNA:DNA duplexes (Jinek et al., 2011) provided that the 5′ RNA overhang is of sufficient length. Therefore Xrn1 may function not only to control VacV mRNA turnover, but also destabilize RNA duplexes and directly degrade imperfectly annealed strands.

    • Rrp17p Is a Eukaryotic Exonuclease Required for 5′ End Processing of Pre-60S Ribosomal RNA

      2009, Molecular Cell
      Citation Excerpt :

      Significant differences in the efficiency of degradation between 5′-monophosphorylated and triphosphorylated substrate (Figures 4C, S5A, and S5B) were observed, indicating that Rrp17p is indeed sensitive to the phosphorylation state of the 5′ end. We performed a similar analysis with substrates carrying a 5′-hydroxyl group or a 5′mG-cap structure, features known to inhibit Rat1p and Xrn1p activity (Poole and Stevens, 1997). However, while the 5′mG-cap containing substrate was less efficiently degraded than the control 5′ or 3′ end-labeled substrates, the 5′-hydroxyl end substrate was not (Figures 4C, S5C, and S5D); it therefore appears that Rrp17p has a somewhat different mode of function to Rat1p and Xrn1p.

    • Rat1p nuclease

      2001, Methods in Enzymology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Xrn2 is also inhibited by the presence of strong secondary structures within RNAs. Oligo(G) tracts of 16 to 18 nucleotides in length effectively block degradation by Xrn2.15 RNAs containing such oligo(G) tracts are degraded from the 5′ end up to the 5′ side of the oligo(G) tract; the remaining 3′ fragment is resistant to further digestion.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    XRN1, protein encoded by theXRN1gene ofS. cerevisiae;HKE1, protein encoded by theHKE1gene ofS. cerevisiae;PABP, poly(A) binding protein

    1

    Corresponding author. Fax: (423) 574-1274. E-mail: [email protected].

    View full text