Regular Article
Whence the Red Panda?

https://doi.org/10.1006/mpev.2000.0819Get rights and content

Abstract

The evolutionary history of the red panda (Ailurus fulgens) plays a pivotal role in the higher-level phylogeny of the “bear-like” arctoid carnivoran mammals. Characters from morphology and molecules have provided inconsistent evidence for placement of the red panda. Whereas it certainly is an arctoid, there has been major controversy about whether it should be placed with the bears (ursids), ursids plus pinnipeds (seals, sea lions, walrus), raccoons (procyonids), musteloids (raccoons plus weasels, skunks, otters, and badgers [mustelids]), or as a monotypic lineage of uncertain phylogenetic affinities. Nucleotide sequence data from three mitochondrial genes and one nuclear intron were analyzed, with more complete taxonomic sampling of relevant taxa (arctoids) than previously available in analyses of primary molecular data, to clarify the phylogenetic relationships of the red panda to other arctoid carnivorans. This study provides detailed phylogenetic analyses (both parsimony and maximum-likelihood) of primary character data for arctoid carnivorans, including bootstrap and decay indices for all arctoid nodes, and three statistical tests of alternative phylogenetic hypotheses for the placement of the red panda. Combined phylogenetic analyses reject the hypotheses that the red panda is most closely related to the bears (ursids) or to the raccoons (procyonids). Rather, evidence from nucleotide sequences strongly support placement of the red panda within a broad Musteloidea (sensu lato) clade, including three major lineages (the red panda, the skunks [mephitids], and a clearly monophyletic clade of procyonids plus mustelids [sensu stricto, excluding skunks]). Within the Musteloidea, interrelationships of the three major lineages are unclear and probably are best considered an unresolved trichotomy. These data provide compelling evidence for the relationships of the red panda and demonstrate that small taxonomic sample sizes can result in misleading or possibly erroneous (based on prior modeling, as well as conflict between the results of our analyses of less and more complete data sets) conclusions about phylogenetic relationships and taxonomy.

References (47)

  • J.J. Bull et al.

    Partitioning and combining data in phylogenetic analysis

    Syst. Biol.

    (1993)
  • D.D. Davis

    The giant panda: A morphological study of evolutionary mechanisms

    Fieldiana Zool. Mem.

    (1964)
  • A. de Queiroz

    For consensus (sometimes)

    Syst. Biol.

    (1993)
  • A. de Queiroz et al.

    Separate versus combined analysis of phylogenetic evidence

    Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst.

    (1995)
  • J.W. Dragoo et al.

    Systematics of mustelid-like carnivores

    J. Mammal.

    (1997)
  • Felsenstein, J. 1993, PHYLIP: Phylogeny Inference Package, version 3.5c, Department of Genetics, Univ. of Washington,...
  • J.J. Flynn

    Phylogeny and rates of evolution: Morphological, taxic and molecular

  • J.J. Flynn et al.

    Phylogeny of the Carnivora

  • E. Geoffroy-Saint-Hilaire et al.

    Histoire Naturelle des Mammifères, avec des Figures Originales, Coloriées, Dessinées d'après des Animaux Vivans

    (1825)
  • D. Goldman et al.

    Molecular genetic-distance estimates among the Ursidae as indicated by one- and two-dimensional protein electrophoresis

    Evolution

    (1989)
  • W.K. Gregory

    On the phylogenetic relationships of the giant Panda (Ailuropoda) to other arctoid Carnivora

    Am. Mus. Novit.

    (1936)
  • D.M. Irwin et al.

    Evolution of the cytochrome b gene of mammals

    J. Mol. Evol.

    (1991)
  • H. Kishino et al.

    Evaluation of the maximum likelihood estimate of the evolutionary tree topologies from DNA sequence data, and the branching order in Hominoidea

    J. Mol. Evol.

    (1989)
  • Cited by (110)

    • Reaching over the gap: A review of trends in and status of red panda research over 193 years (1827–2020)

      2021, Science of the Total Environment
      Citation Excerpt :

      Only seven studies have primarily focussed on taxonomy and phylogeny. These include (Slattery and O'Brien, 1995; Vrana et al., 1994; Sato et al., 2009; Flynn et al., 2000; Fisher et al., 2006; Fisher et al., 2008; Hu et al., 2020). The studies under this theme include assessment of communities' attitudes towards conservation (Sharma et al., 2019); ethnozoological use and belief (Bista et al., 2020); the potential of the red panda as the indicator species (Roka et al., 2020); societal recognition of ecosystem services provided by red panda habitats (Bhatta et al., 2020) and mapping conflict between biodiversity and human needs (Fox et al., 1996).

    • The taxonomy and phylogeny of Ailurus

      2021, Red Panda: Biology and Conservation of the First Panda, Second Edition
    • Phenotypic and geographic diversity of the lesser panda Parailurus

      2021, Red Panda: Biology and Conservation of the First Panda, Second Edition
    • Evolution of the family Ailuridae: origins and Old-World fossil record

      2021, Red Panda: Biology and Conservation of the First Panda, Second Edition
    • Systematic revision of the Ailurinae (Mammalia: Carnivora: Ailuridae): with a new species from North America

      2021, Red Panda: Biology and Conservation of the First Panda, Second Edition
    • Spatiotemporal walking gait kinematics of semi-arboreal red pandas (Ailurus fulgens)

      2023, Journal of Experimental Zoology Part A: Ecological and Integrative Physiology
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Present address: P.O. Box 637, Maple Valley, WA 98038.

    View full text