Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Protocol - Intervention

Nicotine receptor partial agonists for smoking cessation

This is not the most recent version

Collapse all Expand all

Abstract

This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (Intervention). The objectives are as follows:

To review the efficacy of nicotine receptor partial agonists such as varenicline and cytisine for smoking cessation.

Background

Smoking is the main preventable cause worldwide of morbidity and premature death. At current rates of smoking, about half of all smokers in the USA and the UK will die prematurely of tobacco‐related diseases (DOH 1998; Fiore 2004). The list of illnesses known to be linked to smoking is rapidly expanding, and now includes cancers of the cervix, pancreas, kidneys and stomach, aortic aneurisms, acute myeloid leukemia, cataracts, pneumonia and gum disease. These are in addition to the long‐established links between tobacco use and such illnesses as lung cancer, cardiovascular diseases, and emphysema, and with prematurity, sudden infant death syndrome and low birth weight in the babies of maternal smokers (Surgeon General 2004).

Innovative drugs for smoking cessation are increasingly building upon a growing understanding of the neurochemistry of nicotine addiction (Fagerstrom 2006). There is compelling evidence that dependence upon nicotine reflects the effects of the drug at neuronal nicotinic receptors in the brain (Benowitz 1999; Picciotto 1999). More recent studies have explored the potential of neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) as targets for a variety of therapeutic interventions (Hogg 2004). It is thought that the addictive properties of nicotine are mediated through its action as an agonist at α4β2 nAChRs, which stimulates the release of dopamine (Coe 2005).

The Pfizer research team which set out to develop a drug to counteract the effects of nicotine on the nAChRs started with the naturally‐occurring alkaloid compound cytisine, which had been shown to be an effective partial agonist for α4β2 receptors (Papke 1994; Slater 2003). Cytisine was developed as a treatment for tobacco dependence in the Soviet Union in the 1960s, and is still commercially available in Bulgaria and through internet sales, under the trade name of Tabex (Foulds 2004). Its manufacurers, Sopharma Pharmaceuticals, developed their phytoproduct from the plant Cytisus Laborinum L. (Golden Rain).

Varenicline was developed in 1997 (Coe 2005), and is described as a selective nicotinic receptor partial agonist. It was designed to selectively activate the α4β2nAChR, mimicking the action of nicotine and causing a moderate and sustained release of mesolimbic dopamine (Sands 2005). This, it was suggested, should counteract withdrawal symptoms consequent upon low dopamine release during smoking cessation attempts. However, because it is a partial agonist at these receptors, it does not elicit the substantial increases in dopamine overflow evoked by nicotine and, perhaps more importantly, it blocks the effects of a subsequent nicotine challenge on dopamine release from the mesolimbic neurones thought pivotal to the development of nicotine dependence (Coe 2005).

Trials of cytisine have been conducted in Bulgaria, Germany and Poland, and trials of varenicline are currently underway or in the preliminary report stage in the USA.

Objectives

To review the efficacy of nicotine receptor partial agonists such as varenicline and cytisine for smoking cessation.

Methods

Criteria for considering studies for this review

Types of studies

Randomized controlled trials

Types of participants

Adult smokers

Types of interventions

Selective nicotine receptor partial agonists, including varenicline and cytisine, or any other in this class of drug (such as dianicline) as they reach Phase III trial stage. The efficacy of lobeline is covered in an earlier Cochrane review (Stead 2003).

Types of outcome measures

A minimum of six months abstinence is the primary outcome measure. We will use sustained cessation rates in preference to point prevalence, and we will prefer some form of biochemical verification of self‐reported quitting. We will regard smokers lost to follow up as continuing smokers. We will note any adverse effects of treatment.

Search methods for identification of studies

We will search the Tobacco Addiction Review Group specialised register for trials, using the terms ('varenicline' or 'cytisine' or 'nicotine receptor partial agonist') and 'smoking' in the title or abstract, or as keywords. This register has been developed from electronic searching of MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and Web of Science, together with handsearching of specialist journals, conference proceedings and reference lists of previous trials and overviews. We will also search MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and PsycINFO, using the major MESH terms 'Nicotinic‐Agonists' and 'Receptors, Nicotinic'. We will also attempt to contact the authors of ongoing studies of varenicline and cytisine.

Data collection and analysis

We will check the abstracts of studies generated by the search strategy for relevance, and will acquire full reports of any trials that might be included in the review. One author will extract the data, and a second author will check them. Any discrepancies will be resolved by mutual consent, or by recourse to the editorial base. We will note reasons for the non‐inclusion of studies.

Studies will be evaluated on the basis of the quality of the randomization procedure and allocation concealment, as described in the Cochrane Collaboration Handbook. The following information about each trial, where it is available, will be reported in the table 'Characteristics of Included Studies':

  • Country and setting (e.g. primary care, community, hospital outpatient/inpatient).

  • Method of selection of participants

  • Definition of smoker used

  • Methods of randomization and allocation, and blinding of trialists, participants and assessors

  • Demographic characteristics of participants (e.g. average age, sex, average cigs/day).

  • Intervention and control description (provider, duration, number of visits, etc.).

  • Outcomes including definition of abstinence used, and biochemical validation of cessation

  • Proportion of participants with follow‐up data

  • Any adverse events

Quit rates will be calculated based on the numbers of people randomized to an intervention (i.e an intention‐to‐treat analysis), and excluding any deaths. We will regard those who drop out or are lost to follow up as continuing smokers. We will note any deaths and adverse events in the results section.
If appropriate, we will conduct a meta‐analysis of the included studies, using the Mantel‐Haenszel odds ratio and a fixed‐effect method, provided that there is no significant heterogeneity.