Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Protocol - Intervention

Aromatase Inhibitors for treatment of metastatic breast cancer

This is not the most recent version

Collapse all Expand all

Abstract

This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (Intervention). The objectives are as follows:

This systematic review aims to assess the efficacy of aromatase inhibitors in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer.

Background

Worldwide, breast cancer is the commonest cause of cancer and cancer mortality in women Ferlay 2000. Metastatic breast cancer occurs when there is spread of the cancer outside the breast and regional node areas; this may occur despite adjuvant systemic therapy having been given. Once breast cancer becomes metastatic, it is no longer curable but is treatable, the aim of further treatment being to improve quality and length of life.

It has been shown that endocrine therapy improves survival in early breast cancer. Breast cancer cells that are endocrine‐dependent need oestrogen to proliferate. Early methods of hormonal therapy consisted of endocrine organ ablation by surgery Beatson 1896 but these procedures have been largely superseded by effective hormonal treatments. The most important single characteristic predicting response to hormone therapy is the original tumour receptor status EBCTG 1998. A good initial response to endocrine treatment is an indication to continue, on relapse, with second and even third line endocrine therapy until the disease becomes hormone resistant Roseman 1997.

Most endocrine therapies either block the binding of oestrogen to its receptor or reduce serum and tumour concentrations of oestradiol. The most widely‐used endocrine therapy for treatment of hormone‐sensitive metastatic disease is tamoxifen Howell 1997. Tamoxifen is an oral, non‐steroidal, competitive oestrogen receptor antagonist. However it also has an agonist effect; patients may relapse and develop acquired resistance to tamoxifen, although they may still respond to further different endocrine therapy .

In postmenopausal, women androgens (mainly from the adrenal glands) are converted into oestrogens in peripheral tissue by the enzyme aromatase Miller 1996. Aromatase inhibitors are a class of compounds that act systemically to inhibit oestrogen synthesis in tissues. Aromatase inhibitors are of two types, reversible and irreversible; both types of inhibitors compete with normal substrates for binding on the enzyme. The non‐competitive inhibitors (all steroidal) leave the enzyme permanently inactivated Ibrahim 1995.

Aminoglutethimide was the first generation aromatase inhibitor and although effective, it was poorly tolerated and was supplanted by the well‐tolerated second generation steroidal aromatase inhibitor 4‐OH‐androstenedione (formestane). Third generation aromatase inhibitors fall into two principal categories (a) non‐steroidal, reversible (triazole derivatives fadrozole, vorozole, letrozole, anastrazole) and (b) steroidal, irreversible (exemestane).

There is no evidence that any of the inhibitors differentially inhibit aromatase in different tissues and their role in premenopausal patients and in early breast cancer is still be elucidated.

Objectives

This systematic review aims to assess the efficacy of aromatase inhibitors in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer.

Methods

Criteria for considering studies for this review

Types of studies

Only bona fide randomised controlled studies of the following types will be included:

  • trials of patients with metastatic breast cancer

  • trials stratified by stage of disease to allow identification of patients with metastatic breast cancer

  • trials including patients with locally advanced or recurrent disease but where these constitute less than 10% patient population

  • trials comparing the types of interventions listed below

Types of participants

Women with metastatic breast cancer, either at diagnosis or upon relapse

  • any metastatic site

  • any age

  • postmenopausal, any age

  • ER receptor positive or unknown

Types of interventions

Randomised studies comparing the following treatments:

  • aromatase inhibitors versus other hormonal treatment

  • aromatase inhibitors versus no hormonal treatment

  • hormonal treatment + aromatase inhibitors versus hormonal treatment

  • direct comparison between different aromatase inhibitors

Types of outcome measures

primary outcome

  • overall survival

  • disease‐free survival

secondary outcomes

  • time to progression

  • time to treatment end (stop or change due to toxicity)

  • response rate

  • treatment toxicity (particularly endocrine‐related)

  • Quality of Life (where available and comparable)

  • drop out

subgroup analyses ‐ performed if sufficient data

  • ER positive versus ER unknown

  • initial therapy for metastatic disease versus second‐line therapy

  • first‐line tamoxifen versus tamoxifen resistant

  • previous chemotherapy (CMF, anthracycline containing regimens, other)

  • age greater than 50 years versus 50 or less

  • site of distant metastases and differential treatment effect

Search methods for identification of studies

See: Collaborative Review Group Search Strategy
The specialised register maintained by the Cochrane Breast Cancer Group will be searched. (Details of search strategies used by the group for the identification of studies are outlined in the group's module.)
The Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (CENTRAL/CCTR) and relevant conference proceedings will also be searched.
Each pharmaceutical company will be approached to ask whether further data are available in addition to published data. Permission for use will be requested; if this is not granted, the trials and number of patients not been included in the review will be documented.

Data collection and analysis

Trials identified through the search strategy will be reviewed by the authors who will independently decide on eligibility.
Any exclusions will be justified and documented.
For unpublished trials, information will be obtained from the protocol or other available source
Missing or additional information will be sought from authors.

Methodology of studies:
The quality of the randomisation will be assessed by grading the quality of the allocation concealment as:
adequate
unclear
inadequate

In the event of uncertainty, the study investigators will be contacted for clarification.
Any difference in grading by the reviewers will be resolved by discussion.

Data extraction will be performed independently by two reviewers.
The reviewers will not be blinded to the source of the document for article selection or data extraction.
Data will be extracted from published reports using data extraction forms.
Data extraction forms will be designed a priori and completed in duplicate.
Extracted data will be reviewed and discrepancies resolved by discussion.

The most complete dataset feasible will be assembled.
All analyses will be by intention to treat.

The Cochrane Review Manager Software (RevMan 4) will be used to analyse the data.