 |
|
Oxycodone vs Placebo in Children With Undifferentiated Abdominal Pain
A Randomized, Double-blind Clinical Trial of the Effect of Analgesia on Diagnostic Accuracy
Hannu Kokki, MD;
Hannu Lintula, MD;
Kari Vanamo, MD;
Marjut Heiskanen, RN;
Matti Eskelinen, MD
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005;159:320-325.
Background Analgesics for children with acute abdominal pain are often withheld for fear that they might mask physical examination findings and thus might be unsafe. This viewpoint has been challenged recently.
Objective To evaluate the effects of buccal oxycodone on pain relief, physical examination findings, diagnostic accuracy, and final clinical outcomes in children with acute abdominal pain.
Design Prospective, randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled trial between December 2001 and November 2003.
Setting University teaching hospital in Finland.
Patients A total of 104 children aged 4 to 15 years with abdominal pain of less than 7 days’ duration were screened, and 63 children with pain scores of 5 or higher on a 10-cm visual analog scale were eligible for the trial.
Intervention Children were randomized to receive buccally either 0.1 mg/kg–1 of oxycodone hydrochloride (n = 32) or the same volume of normal saline (n = 31). The same surgeon described the physical findings and indicated a provisional diagnosis and a provisional disposition before the children received the study medication and at 1 hour and 3.5 hours after initial dosing. Pain scores were recorded at baseline and every 30 minutes for 3.5 hours after the first study drug administration.
Main Outcome Measures Pain intensity difference, presence or absence of abdominal guarding, and diagnostic accuracy.
Results The demographic characteristics, initial pain scores, and physical signs and symptoms were similar between the 2 groups. Both study drugs were associated with decreasing pain scores. The summed pain intensity difference over 7 observations was significantly greater in the oxycodone group, 22 ± 18 cm, than in the placebo group, 9 ± 12 cm (mean difference 13 cm, with a 95% confidence interval of 2-24 cm; P = .04). The diagnostic accuracy increased from 72% to 88% in the oxycodone group and remained at 84% in the placebo group after study drug administration. Laparotomy was performed in 17 patients in the oxycodone group and in 14 patients in the placebo group. Four patients without appendicitis underwent exploratory laparotomy in each group. One patient in the placebo group was initially diagnosed as having nonspecific abdominal pain, but at 14 hours, she was operated on for appendiceal perforation.
Conclusions Early administration of buccal oxycodone provides a significant pain relief to children with acute abdominal pain, without adversely altering the clinical signs or obscuring the surgical diagnosis.
Author Affiliations: Departments of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care (Dr Kokki), Pediatric Surgery (Drs Lintula and Vanamo and Ms Heiskanen), and Surgery (Dr Eskelinen), Kuopio University Hospital, and Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Kuopio, Kuopio, Finland (Dr Kokki).
RELATED ARTICLE
Does the Use of Oxycodone Affect Diagnostic Accuracy in Children With Acute Abdominal Pain?
Michael E. Bowen, Katherine A. Poehling, Veronica L. Gunn, Kecia N. Carroll, S. Todd Callahan, Patrick G. Arbogast, and William O. Cooper
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005;159(4):326-328.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
|
Opiates and Acute Abdominal Pain
Radzik et al.
JAMA 2007;297:467-468.
FULL TEXT
Do opiates affect the clinical evaluation of patients with acute abdominal pain?
Ranji et al.
JAMA 2006;296:1764-1774.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Buccal oxycodone reduced pain more than placebo in children with acute undifferentiated abdominal pain
Attia
Evid. Based Med. 2005;10:147-147.
FULL TEXT
Does Oxycodone Obscure the Etiology of Abdominal Pain in Children?
JWatch Emergency Med. 2005;2005:3-3.
FULL TEXT
Does the Use of Oxycodone Affect Diagnostic Accuracy in Children With Acute Abdominal Pain?
Bowen et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2005;159:326-328.
FULL TEXT
|
