Nicolau Syndrome in Patient Following Diclofenac Administration: A Case Report

Nicolau syndrome is a rare adverse drug reaction that occurs at the site an intramuscular injection. It was first described in the 1920s in a patient treated with bismuth salts for syphilis1, 2. The phenomenon has been related to the intramuscular administration of a variety of drugs, including non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), corticosteroids, and penicillin. Histologic findings include thrombosis of vessels in the reticular dermis. Patients who undergo total knee arthroplasty experience severe pain postoperatively, so surgeons frequently prescribe NSAIDs, which are administered intramuscularly, for pain control. We report a patient with typical features of Nicolau syndrome following diclofenac injection who underwent bilateral total knee arthroplasty.

69-year-old moderately obese woman (77 kg, 157 cm) underwent bilateral simultaneous total knee arthroplasty. Her body mass index was 31.2 kg/m², and she had a medical history of diabetes and hypertension. She was being discharged the following day, and her progress was good. The night before discharge, immediately after the diclofenac injection, the patient complained of intense pain in her right buttock. The skin was swollen and showed diffuse redness, with blanching at the injection site. The next morning, the area around the injection site was exquisitely tender to palpation. The skin showed erythematous maculae and a livedoid violaceous patch with dendritic extensions. The initial differential diagnosis included allergic reaction to the diclofenac, acute bleeding, hematoma, and acute compartment syndrome. On the second day post-injection, her skin turned dark purple with a hemorrhagic patch. By the 10^th day post-injection, the erythematic area had decreased, but most of the darkly colored skin had progressively turned black. Two weeks later, the black skin had changed into an eschar (Fig. 1). Three weeks later, when the progression had stopped, we persuaded her to undergo surgical debridement of the necrotic tissue. We preoperatively checked the computed tomography (CT) scan to define the extent of the lesion, muscular involvement, hematoma, and fluid collection. CT scan revealed only diffuse infiltration into the subcutaneous adipose tissue at the injection site. The muscles had been spared, and no liquid had collected under the eschar (Fig. 2).

Fig. 1
Photography of right gluteal lesion three weeks post injection illustrating the nature and extent of the eschar.

• Click for larger image

Fig. 2
Post gadolinium enhanced computed tomography (CT) scan. The CT scan image showed an enhanced subcutaneous infiltration in the right buttock. There was no evidence of underlying muscle involvement, hematoma, or acute bleeding.

• Click for larger image

The first debridement was performed across an area 20×14 cm and confirmed that the necrosis extended to the patient's skin and subcutaneous fat, but the underlying muscles were intact. We covered the defect with a full-thickness skin graft. Two months later, the lesion had healed, leaving only a residual scar (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
Two months later, the defect appeared completely healed, with a small depressed scar.

• Click for larger image

No tool or test exists for making a confirmative diagnosis of Nicolau syndrome; it is based purely on the clinical features and their correlation with previous case reports. One report suggests that laboratory tests reveal creatine kinase and myoglobin as well as other markers of muscle damage3, but that author thought that a mere increase in creatine kinase and myoglobin does not automatically mean necrosis with muscle involvement. In addition, our patient experienced no increase in creatine kinase or myoglobin.

Necrotic ulcers usually heal in several months, leaving an atrophic scar. However, transient or permanent ischemia of the ipsilateral limb and various neurological complications sometimes develop4. Our patient's lesion rapidly progressed to extensive necrosis and, despite conservative therapy, needed surgical reconstruction. Diclofenac is a cyclooxygenase inhibitor and thus shares the pharmacodynamic properties of NSAIDs, with inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis resulting in the vasoconstrictive phenomenon. In this case, injection of diclofenac was followed by the application of a cool pack that could mediate additional local vasospasm in the context of arterial narrowing. We suggest that both mechanisms contributed in a detrimentally synergistic fashion to the magnitude of her acute vasospasm. That might be the reason for the rapid progression to necrosis of our patient's lesion.

Experimental studies have disproven the original hypothesis of Nicolau syndrome's allergic and immunologic origins. Most significantly, a patient's reinjection with the agent that caused Nicolau syndrome has not induced recurrence1. Our patient had received intramuscular diclofenac before and after the development of Nicolau syndrome, but the adverse reaction did not recur. Several theories exist. First, an intra-arterial, periarterial, or perinervous injection might produce intense local pain and a secondary vasospasm owing to sympathetic nerve stimulation, leading to ischemia with subsequent muscular and/or cutaneous necrosis. Second, an inadvertent intra-arterial injection of solutions intended for intramuscular use might cause embolic occlusion of small skin arteries. Third, vascular or perivascular injection might produce marked inflammation and progressive necrosis of the intima, destroying the whole arterial wall and causing necrosis of the skin.

Subcutaneous instead of intramuscular injection was an important contributing factor in several reports5-7. Cockshott et al.6 highlighted the difficulties of administering intramuscular injections. Only 5% of females and 15% of males can receive a gluteal injection with a standard 3.5 cm needle. Okan and Canter7 described subcutaneous injection and injury to cutaneous arteries, leading to subcutaneous fat and skin necrosis. In our case, the injection could have been subcutaneous due to her obesity and difficulty in position change. CT scan demonstrated only diffuse infiltration in the adipose tissue at the injection site. A sufficiently long needle for an obese patient, the Z-track method of intramuscular injection, injection only after aspiration with a syringe, and an injection in the upper outer quadrant of the gluteal region, which has few large blood vessels, can minimize subcutaneous irritation.

In our case, it was difficult to differentiate Nicolau syndrome from acute compartment syndrome, which presents with severe pain, pallor, and swelling. In acute compartment syndrome, treatment is early surgical decompression within 12 hours to prevent irreversible changes of nerve and muscle. CT is a useful tool for differentiation. In acute compartment syndrome, there is hematoma or fluid collection on the buttock.

Although physicians have recognized rapid vasoactive therapy with subcutaneous heparin as beneficial, no specific therapy for Nicolau syndrome exists other than prevention. Clinicians should be aware of this complication and avoid unnecessary intramuscular drug injections. Finally, physicians should consider Nicolau syndrome as a diagnostic possibility for anyone presenting with severe localized pain following an intramuscular injection of any substance.